Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Bad bokeh
From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:36:16 -0700
References: <EC1D893EF5042348ADC8A79B742E9EFB6D87A8@GCI-MOCEX01.us.ad.gannett.com> <005301c1978a$d5e7bde0$82120e18@phnx1.az.home.com>

"Worth discussion"

Regards,

Greg

Steve Barbour wrote:

>......whoa nelly !... the stuff in front kind of overwhelms the
>"bokeh"......     ;-)
>
>and if the background is euphemistically called bokeh,  what do you call
>the stuff in the foreground....?
>
>Anyone??
>
>
>Steve
>
>>Here's another:
>>
>>http://members.aol.com/zeissleica/private/Bluebells.jpg
>>
>>This was shot with a 1936 Leica Xenon 50mm f/1.5 wide open with Provia
>>100F.  Very bizarre.
>>
>>/Mitch
>>
>
>>see http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/mf/bokeh.html for a good example of
>>bad bokeh ;-) a few bad examples are more telling than good ones IMHO
>>;-)
>>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Zeissler, Mitch" <mzeissle@gcipoa.gannett.com> (RE: [Leica] Bad bokeh)
Message from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Bad bokeh)