Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Bad bokeh
From: "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:48:50 -0500
References: <EC1D893EF5042348ADC8A79B742E9EFB6D87A8@GCI-MOCEX01.us.ad.gannett.com> <005301c1978a$d5e7bde0$82120e18@phnx1.az.home.com>

Boogas!
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Bad bokeh


> ......whoa nelly !... the stuff in front kind of overwhelms the
> "bokeh"......     ;-)
> 
> and if the background is euphemistically called bokeh,  what do you call
> the stuff in the foreground....?
> 
> Anyone??
> 
> 
> Steve
> 
> > Here's another:
> >
> > http://members.aol.com/zeissleica/private/Bluebells.jpg
> >
> > This was shot with a 1936 Leica Xenon 50mm f/1.5 wide open with Provia
> > 100F.  Very bizarre.
> >
> > /Mitch
> >
> 
> >
> > see http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/mf/bokeh.html for a good example of
> > bad bokeh ;-) a few bad examples are more telling than good ones IMHO
> > ;-)
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Zeissler, Mitch" <mzeissle@gcipoa.gannett.com> (RE: [Leica] Bad bokeh)
Message from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Bad bokeh)