Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Bad bokeh
From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 07:51:48 -0700
References: <EC1D893EF5042348ADC8A79B742E9EFB6D87A8@GCI-MOCEX01.us.ad.gannett.com>

......whoa nelly !... the stuff in front kind of overwhelms the
"bokeh"......     ;-)

and if the background is euphemistically called bokeh,  what do you call
the stuff in the foreground....?

Anyone??


Steve

> Here's another:
>
> http://members.aol.com/zeissleica/private/Bluebells.jpg
>
> This was shot with a 1936 Leica Xenon 50mm f/1.5 wide open with Provia
> 100F.  Very bizarre.
>
> /Mitch
>

>
> see http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/mf/bokeh.html for a good example of
> bad bokeh ;-) a few bad examples are more telling than good ones IMHO
> ;-)


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] Bad bokeh)
Reply from "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Bad bokeh)
In reply to: Message from "Zeissler, Mitch" <mzeissle@gcipoa.gannett.com> (RE: [Leica] Bad bokeh)