Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The only Constitutionally based "freedom of the press" in the U. S. is the freedom to publish that which you find out - or photograph - without prior restraint. While there are 'shield laws,' and 'sunshine laws' guaranteeing that certain meetings, etc., are open to the public, there is NO Constitutionally guaranteed right to find out things which people don't want one to find out. B. D. John Collier wrote: > Apparently the US is taking quite a public beating over this in Europe. Yet > France blew up the Greenpeace ship they were being bothered with. The agents > responsible were returned to France to serve out the rest of their long > sentences. France violated the agreement they had worked out and released > their agents. Whether you agree with the US actions or not, I think that at > least they did not murder anyone. This journalist will get his say in a > public court of law with full rights of legal representation and appeal. > > Second, as far as I know, there are no provisions in the US constitution > which give the press immunity to perform illegal acts. Many brave > journalists have committed illegal acts to cover a story they felt > important. It is a calculated risk and one that needs to be made carefully > with the full realisation of the consequences. One gets the impression this > photographer felt he had diplomatic immunity. > > John Collier > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html