Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? Is Salgado?
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:33:17 -0500
References: <LNBBLBNFHNEHGFKFMALGAEIFOKAA.tim@KairosPhoto.com> <01b901c18a4b$64f14bc0$b0a601d5@littlesod> <001901c18a55$36e2a1c0$07bce60c@C1386688I>

What in Gds name does getting corporate support for a project that is 
not about the corporation have to do with whether one is or isn't a 
photojournalist? What about the folks who are featured in Nikon, Canon, 
Leica, etc. promotional material...are they no longer photojournalists?



Jim Laurel wrote:

> Where'd you get that figure, Harold?  I can't imagine that Migrations,
> though an epic work, cost USD 6 million to produce.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harold Gess" <Harold.Gess@btinternet.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? Is Salgado?
> 
> 
> 
>>Thinking about it, Salgado accepted 6 million dollars from Kodak to make
>>Migrations. Maybe the fact that it was paid for by a corporation means he
>>
> is
> 
>>not actually a PJ either........
>>
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> 


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com> (RE: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj?)
Message from "Harold Gess" <Harold.Gess@btinternet.com> (Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? Is Salgado?)
Message from "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com> (Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? Is Salgado?)