Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? Is Salgado?
From: "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:24:55 -0800
References: <LNBBLBNFHNEHGFKFMALGAEIFOKAA.tim@KairosPhoto.com> <01b901c18a4b$64f14bc0$b0a601d5@littlesod>
 
Where'd you get that figure, Harold?  I can't imagine that Migrations,
though an epic work, cost USD 6 million to produce.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Harold Gess" <Harold.Gess@btinternet.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? Is Salgado?


> Thinking about it, Salgado accepted 6 million dollars from Kodak to make
> Migrations. Maybe the fact that it was paid for by a corporation means he
is
> not actually a PJ either........


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? Is Salgado?)
 In reply to: Message from "Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com> (RE: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj?)
Message from "Harold Gess" <Harold.Gess@btinternet.com> (Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? Is Salgado?)