Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> nevertheless, > they say they prefer the Ilford as a 400 film. another thing i like about > HP5+ is that you can get it in all the formats i like: 35, 120 and 220. + Ilford continues (for the present) to support various different sheet formats e.g. 5x7, as well as supply it in more "reasonable" amounts in all sizes (i.e. less than Kodak's minimum 100/250 sheets). Kodak seems down the road of abandoning sheet film in all but the most inconvenient way - and possibly altogether. At 400 I have always found Ilford nicer film - and I often push it to 800 - suits me (but then I grew up with Ilford - I must have been 17 before I even knew Kodak made anything other than colour print film, and Kodachrome!). Tim a > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Rei > Shinozuka > Sent: December 11, 2001 8:34 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri-X vs. HP5+ at ISO 800 > > > this is from memory, so please forgive me if i misrepresent any > statements. > > anchell and troop mention these two films in the _darkroom > cookbook_. they > say that Tri-X was the most pushable film made until TMZ came along. they > also say that HP5+ is much less pushable, limited to about 800. > nevertheless, > they say they prefer the ilford as a 400 film. another thing i like about > HP5+ is that you can get it in all the formats i like: 35, 120 and 220. > > at 800 ASA, you might also consider Fuji Neopan 1600 which in my testing > has a true speed of around 800 or so, so no pushing would be required for > your application. > > -rei > > > > From: "Oliver Bryk" <oliverbryk@attbi.com> > > > > To plan some work in available semi-darkness with my Summicron-M f/2, I > > asked my friendly b&w custom processor for his views on rating > Tri-X at ISO > > 800 (Jim Mitchell's M.O. for his rock photos). Pierre said that in his > > experience HP5+ was more amenable to pushing than Tri-X. > > I would be curious about any confirming or dissenting views > regarding the > > specific choice between these two emulsions. > > Oliver Bryk > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html