Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri-X vs. HP5+ at ISO 800
From: Mark Kronquist <>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 08:59:43 -0800

On 12/11/01 6:37 AM, "Oliver Bryk" <> wrote:

> To plan some work in available semi-darkness with my Summicron-M f/2, I
> asked my friendly b&w custom processor for his views on rating Tri-X at ISO
> 800 (Jim Mitchell's M.O. for his rock photos). Pierre said that in his
> experience HP5+ was more amenable to pushing than Tri-X.
> I would be curious about any confirming or dissenting views regarding the
> specific choice between these two emulsions.
> Oliver Bryk
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
Shoot Delta 3200 (normal ISA 1250)  Mark

- --
To unsubscribe, see