Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: If only one more R lens,
From: Jim Brick <>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 13:46:08 -0800

The latest version 28/2.8 with built-in hood.

O-U-T-S-T-A-N-D-I-N-G lens!

And compliments the 50 perfectly.


At 12:56 PM 11/25/2001 -0800, Larry Fuller wrote:
>I recently became the owner of a R3 with the standard 50mm lens. I'm
>practicing with it (12-15 rolls a month), but am now interested in a
>different lens. About 30% of my shots are around or in the house, or at
>a motorcycle rally, with a range of approx.10 feet. The other 70 % are
>shot in nature, with about half of that 70 % being landscapes (some at
>considerable distance) and the other half being wildlife (maybe flowers
>up close, maybe a hawk a hundred yards away). If  I could only get one
>more lens, what should it be? And if I could get two more lenses, what
>would they be (same as the second plus another or two completely
>different ones)? And what if I could get three?!? My total budget is
>probably around $4,000, so one of those lens at $8-10,000 is out of the
>question. Thanks for any help.
>Bo Fuller
>Southern Calif
>To unsubscribe, see

- --
To unsubscribe, see