Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 'chrome stability
From: "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 09:42:39 -0600
References: <20011117062122.15218.cpmta@c014.snv.cp.net>

If my memory is correct, the high speed tungsten was 125, and daylight was 160 . . .

Regards,
Sonny




- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Herr" <telyt@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 'chrome stability


> On Fri, 16 November 2001, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
> >
> > But i recall a "high speed Ektachrome" of ASA 125.
> >
>
> I thought High Speed Ektachrome was ASA 160
>
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> ___________________________________________________
> The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
>  Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
>  250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
>  http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: 'chrome stability)