Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]George Weir wrote: > > Ok Walt I'll bite, and no flame intended; > > If there is no difference in results as you say then why would it be > that clients, photographers and non-photographers can correctly identify > the "better photos" when shown a set taken under same circumstances, > using same film, developer, paper etc.? Perhaps they see a difference because you take better photos with your Leica equipment than you do with Nikon equipment. You may be more comfortable with the Leica equipment. You may 'see' better with the Leica equipment. You may tend to use the Leica equipment to take the more impressive shots. You feel more confident as a photographer using the Leica equipment. You may use the Leica equipment to take shots which - - because of the noise - you wouldn't take with the Nikon equipment, and folks really like those shots. There are any number of reasons why your Leica shots might be "better" than the Nikon shots, and not one of those reasons has anything to do with the equipment being inherently better. B. D. Who loves both his Leica and Nikon equipment, each for different reasons. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html