Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]All... I am in the beginning stages of a possible SLR purchase, to supplement my M6 with longer lenses. I'm interested in hearing from others [off-list, if you prefer] that have had experience with both systems. I am interested in the R8 because of the glass [naturally] and the fact it feels so much like using the M [very simple and not a lot of automation]. I am interested in the EOS primarily because of the IS availability and the way it allows one to shoot at low speeds without using a tripod. I have only played with the R8 at the local camera store, so I don't have any field experience to base a comparison on. I will say that the R lens prices throw quite a chill on the party and I'm surprised that auto-bracketing is not possible without the full blown motor drive. I used to own one of the very early EOS bodies back in the mid-80's, but the 1v is very different from what I had back then. I have some experience shooting with a friend's EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM and am astounded by the results. For what it's worth, Ye Olde Locale Camera Store was pushing me in the direction of the Nikon F100. My shooting style is the lighter, the better [I have a couple herniated discs], with glasses. I carry a mini-table tripod, but the full size one is always too much for me on extended hikes, thus the interest in the IS glass. Any comments or shared experiences are welcomed. /Mitch Zeissler - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html