Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica O
From: Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:03:26 -0700
References: <1120AB2026ABD211A82600A024B971370C43D0@einstein.morton.org.uk> <3BD82EE2.FA2F86FC@earthlink.net>

"B. D. Colen" wrote:
> 
> Well, IF I had the spare cash, I'd buy a new IIIG - because even though
> it would cost significantly more than a used model, it would NOT be 45
> years old and come with 45 years worth of aging and problems, whether
> recently CLAed or not, and would probably come with some sort of
> passport warranty. But to each his own. ;-)

And a built in lightmeter...


feli


- -- 
________________________________________________________________________

 "It's truly one of those shows where you just keep expecting Allen Funt
 to come bursting out from behind some 2-way mirror and explain that
 you've been on candid camera for 3 years."
                       -Ethan Ormsby on the status of production, 1999
________________________________________________________________________
        Feli di Giorgio * Compositing Supervisor * DIGITAL DOMAIN
       			      feli@d2.com * Ext. 3074
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Leica O)
Reply from Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> (Re: [Leica] Leica O)
In reply to: Message from leica@davidmorton.org (RE: [Leica] Leica O)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Leica O)