Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, IF I had the spare cash, I'd buy a new IIIG - because even though it would cost significantly more than a used model, it would NOT be 45 years old and come with 45 years worth of aging and problems, whether recently CLAed or not, and would probably come with some sort of passport warranty. But to each his own. ;-) leica@davidmorton.org wrote: > > B. D. Colen wrote: > > "The suggestions that Leica revive - not bring out a replica - of the > IIIG or F is a really good one" > > Why would anyone buy a new IIIf when there are *dozens* of used ones for > sale in everything from user to mint- condition? The new one would probably > 2-3x the price of a nice user plus CLA, maybe even more. The O Series was > different in this regard, since it wasn't in competition with the originals. > A new IIIf would be a *hard* sell for Leica. > > -- > David Morton > dmorton@journalist.co.uk > > "There are only two services that images can offer the afflicted. One is to > find the story that expresses the truth of their affliction. The second is > to find the words that can give resonance, through the crust of external > circumstances, to the cry that is always inaudible: "Why am I being hurt?" > -- Simone Weil > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html