Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/10/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] M camera parts now a long rant.
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:13:05 -0700
References: <SIMEON.10110180821.C@sova-walt.unt.edu> <01b101c15855$0650af20$bd3afea9@oemcomputer> <3.0.2.32.20011020120520.00750204@roanoke.infi.net> <3BD1A3EB.EBEF24C1@earthlink.net> <3BD1AAA7.D0B8B945@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <3BD1ABE4.96BF312B@earthlink.net>
"B. D. Colen" wrote:
>
> Who cares, other than for historical purposes and curiosity? If the
> image quality is up to that expected of the name manufacturer, and the
> build quality is there, what difference does it make?
>
> Mark Rabiner wrote:
> >
> > "B. D. Colen" wrote:
><Snip>
What difference would it make if i liked a picture i saw somewhere i signed my
name to it?
Maybe i could call up the photographer and pay him/her off to do so.
Mark Rabiner
IT'S MY PICTURE DARN IT! I PAID FOR IT!
Portland, Oregon
USA
http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] M camera parts now a long rant.)
In reply to:
Message from Walter S Delesandri <walt@jove.acs.unt.edu> (Re: [Leica] M camera parts)
Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] M camera parts now a long rant.)
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> (Re: [Leica] M camera parts now a long rant.)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] M camera parts now a long rant.)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] M camera parts now a long rant.)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] M camera parts now a long rant.)