Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I get a kick out of these threads. Yes, the M6 RF patch "flares" more than the M3/2/4. It's also brighter, and the RF is simpler....but just as accurate and reliable. As I've been chastised for mentioning in the past, the M6 finder eliminated the easy vertical adjustment, which I don't agree with. But it is IS brighter than my M4, and just as accurate, AND it flares SLIGHTLY more....just move you eye a tiny bit!!!..... Like Ted, if it don't affect the pictures, or make the camera unreliable or unusable, who cares?....I have had many of both, and it was NEVER a "photographic" problem...just a difference. The RF alignment on the M6 is JUST as good as the previous cameras....ONCE IT'S ADJUSTED!!!! (whether they come that way or not...HEHEHEHE>) Walt On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:25:27 -0700 Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> wrote: > At 02:40 PM 10/12/2001 -0400, Robert Schneider wrote: > > >I know this is still irrelevant to Ted, as his M6 rangefinders never > >flare. The only ones in existence, which always makes me wonder just > >who Ted knows at Leica. > > > >;-) ;-) ;-) > > > >Rob Schneider > > > Again, I've never had a flare problem with either of my M6's. But I have > personally known Ernst and Gisela Hartmann for over twenty years. Perhaps > he fixed my M6's via osmosis. > > Jim > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html