Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: Re: [Leica] Leica low on luck
From: "Wang, Albert" <Albert.Wang@ibx.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:04:29 -0400

interesting... what are some arguments for bidding on this critter? :) I
could use it as some glorified Jimi Hendrix commentrative? :)

- -----Original Message-----
From: Dan Cardish [mailto:dcardish@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:42 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: Re: [Leica] Leica low on luck


Actually, I recall an ad campaign from Leica quite a few years ago where
they pictured camera parts even worse off than this poor thing and where
they claimed that these had been covered by the Passport warranty.  As long
as you can return parts of the camera, they will replace it, or so they
once did.

dan c.

At 08:44 AM 10-10-01 -0400, Wang, Albert wrote:
>actually even if the item was under USA passport warranty, Leica Camera
>doesn't cover fire or theft cases for broken or blown up Leicas...
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
...
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html