Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/09/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: OED - OT (was lense (sic) is indeed...)
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 09:32:06 -0400
References: <B7B31512.1E61%mlquinn@san.rr.com> <200108301304.JAA15658@tigercat.nyfir.pwj.com> <20010904150731.K23255@oven.com> <01d301c1358d$791a1d60$3957d03f@MikeGardner>
You want fingernails on a blackboard? How about "people that," rather
than "people who?"
Michael Gardner wrote:
>
> Jeff Moore wrote:
> | Lense? That's nothing. The burr under my saddle is "loose" for
> | "lose". SO many computer geeks have that problem.
>
> Ah, my pet peeve also! It is practically a plague on email lists.
>
> My second biggest language peeve, for which I think we can thank the
> corporate spin doctors, is the current use of the word "issue" when
> "problem" is the appropriate word. Like fingernails on a blackboard!
> Mike Gardner
In reply to:
Message from Mike Quinn <mlquinn@san.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] lense is indeed an acceptable spelling of lens...)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@ubspainewebber.com> ([Leica] OED - OT (was lense (sic) is indeed...))
Message from Jeff Moore <jbm@oven.com> ([Leica] Re: OED - OT (was lense (sic) is indeed...))
Message from "Michael Gardner" <mlgardner99@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: OED - OT (was lense (sic) is indeed...))