Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format
From: "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 22:19:48 +0200
References: <FJEAJICBHEDNLMABPNCPGEODCCAA.george@rdcinteractive.com> <OE258Q9eqwZ2cFXvmBU000017ae@hotmail.com> <3B6853C6.64716B13@earthlink.net> <OE35ldBvxUO8o1iGBGI00005301@hotmail.com> <3B68E974.DDF15C11@hale-pohaku.com> <OE28yseVwrblZz02H670000561d@hotmail.com> <3B6965ED.E06FDAD6@hale-pohaku.com>
Dennis writes:
> Show your work. How did you calculate the
> proportions? sample size, regions of the
> world, or is this just your personal anecdotal
> opinion?
A lot of it comes from seeing the way people on this list behave.
In reply to:
Message from "George Day" <george@rdcinteractive.com> (RE: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)