Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 11:01:38 -0700
References: <FJEAJICBHEDNLMABPNCPGEODCCAA.george@rdcinteractive.com> <OE258Q9eqwZ2cFXvmBU000017ae@hotmail.com> <3B6853C6.64716B13@earthlink.net> <OE35ldBvxUO8o1iGBGI00005301@hotmail.com> <3B68E974.DDF15C11@hale-pohaku.com> <OE28yseVwrblZz02H670000561d@hotmail.com> <3B6965ED.E06FDAD6@hale-pohaku.com> <3B6989A3.F5B1A513@earthlink.net>
And they have every right to pose with Leicas. How else would any of us
be able to afford gear if the dilettante didn't knock out the profit
margin first.
Slobodan Dimitrov
"B. D. Colen" wrote:
>
> Certainly, it is fun to turn the tables on Mxsmanic and ask him to
> provide his sample size, etc. etc. But the sad truth is, I believe, that
> what he wrote about the current Leica owner base is dead-on accurate.
> Sad, but accurate.
>
> B. D.
>
> And, no, I can't supply sample size, working notes, region of the world,
> etc. ;-)
>
> Dư
In reply to:
Message from "George Day" <george@rdcinteractive.com> (RE: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)