Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Compendium Review
From: "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 12:17:59 +0200
References: <3DAE15C6DFDAD211ABA80008C7EABAB302479631@uleis01nok>

> People who pointed out the typos don't have
> to list them and they probably can't be bothered.
> That's probably because most people who read
> the book found a couple themselves.

Exactly, and that is the case for me.

> I just wanted to say that the theoretical
> reasoning in the book raised eyebrows a couple
> of times per chapter.

Which reasoning was that?

> I will not push this thread further.

If the book says things that are not true, I'd like to know about it, as I do
not wish to be misinformed.

In reply to: Message from Ext-Peter.Sikking@nokia.com (RE: [Leica] Compendium Review)