Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Correction: Redundancy re/ 180 f2.0 and the ApoExtenders
From: "Chris Quinn" <cquinn@mail.sjcsf.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:46:05 -0600

Earlier I said:

> I posted this to the LUG yesterday, and it shows up on the subject/topic
> list at the top of the digest, but the message wasn't down below....
>
> So I'll try again:
>


[Editor's Note: Perhaps it didn't show up yesterday because I actually
posted it this morning, which leads me to think that I am not actually
responsible for the Subject heading, either, all of which serves only to
confirm two things: I definitely belong on the LUG, and that I have chosen
my middle name well, if we defer back to the translations provided earlier
in the month, which is how I intend it, and not as some desire to associate
myself gratuitously with the 35Summicron, the Noctilux, or the 75Summicron,
with whom I share no similarity, implied or construed, except maybe the 75,
but that's probably off-topic on this wholesome list.]

C 'Bokeh' Q