Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think the venerable Erwin Putts would disagree as he stated: 'Pictures taken with the Noctilux at f/1,0 and f/1,4 (and adjusted shutter speeds) were measured sensitometrically and the results were identical. This lens is truly a full stop ahead of the Summilux-M 1,4/50' Now, is he right or is he wrong?! Simon Kyle Cassidy wrote: > fwiw, f 1.0 is NOT one stop faster than f 1.4, it's only a third of a stop > faster. so unless you're looking at your images and shaking your head > saying "damit! it's a third of a stop underexposed!" you're okay with your > summilux... > >