Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Steve I forgot about those! Great shots and interesting that the contrast range is very wide, whereas my experience with pushing Scala a couple of stops is that I get very bright highlights and very dark shadows with a real loss of shadow detail. It is hard to tell from a jpeg, but what is the shadow detail like. Do you think it would record any better on a true ASA1600 film? Also, how did you develop the Delta 400? Thanks. Simon Steve LeHuray wrote: > Simon, > > Have never used Neopan or Delta 3200, but here are two shots with delta 400 > rated at 1600: > > http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk26.jpg > > http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk26a.jpg > > Summilux 50/1.4 shot at 60th and f1.4 > > > Does anyone have any opinion/real world experience of the merits of using > > Neopan at its rated speed versus Delta 3200 rated at 1600. Usual things > > such as contrast, sharpness, degree of grain etc. I will be working in some > > very low light next week and I have visited the venue and can get some away > > with 1/30sec to 1/60sec with my Noctilux using 1600ASA film. >