Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Steve > > I forgot about those! Great shots and interesting that the contrast range > is very wide, whereas my experience with pushing Scala a couple of stops is > that I get very bright highlights and very dark shadows with a real loss of > shadow detail. It is hard to tell from a jpeg, but what is the shadow > detail like. Do you think it would record any better on a true ASA1600 > film? Also, how did you develop the Delta 400? > > Thanks. > > Simon 'fraid you might ask me a technical question. Do not know the answers to any of those--to explain; I have a magazine, take pictures, hand film to my lab guy for the last 20 years, he hands me contact sheets, I pick, he makes 8x10 prints, and so on. Sorry, technically i am a dope. But, looking at the original 8x10's there is plenty of shadow detail which does not show up on my dreadful scans. Also,if it is any help, my lab guy says the new Ilford Delta is the best B&W film he has ever seen. sl > > Steve LeHuray wrote: >> Simon, >> >> Have never used Neopan or Delta 3200, but here are two shots with delta > 400 >> rated at 1600: >> >> http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk26.jpg >> >> http://www.streetphoto.net/photo_of_the_week/wk26a.jpg >> >> Summilux 50/1.4 shot at 60th and f1.4 >>