Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux
From: Kyle Cassidy <cassidy@netaxs.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:21:17 -0400 (EDT)
>Currently, I own a 50mm Summilux and sometimes I think I want one
>more stop.
fwiw, f 1.0 is NOT one stop faster than f 1.4, it's only a third of a stop
faster. so unless you're looking at your images and shaking your head
saying "damit! it's a third of a stop underexposed!" you're okay with your
summilux...
Replies:
Reply from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux)
Reply from "Harold Gess" <Harold.Gess@btinternet.com> (Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux)
Reply from "Jorg Willems" <jorg@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux)
Reply from "Mark E Davison" <dmark8@qwest.net> (Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux)
Reply from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux)
Reply from "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com> (Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux)