Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: M Purity/B&W
From: "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:54:53 +0200
References: <200106251413.f5PEDM321252@hermes.toad.net> <OE19rIsqsLwy5scK8t8000013e6@hotmail.com> <f05010411b75de85a2f9d@[195.64.97.125]> <OE67KEwpNzdwcZnOHop0000d3e1@hotmail.com> <004c01c0fe40$f99f42a0$56234d18@gv.shawcable.net>
Ted Grant writes:
> And one might ask, on what "fact" do you base
> your statement on?
The results produced by the film.
In reply to:
Message from "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net> ([Leica] Re: M Purity/B&W)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: M Purity/B&W)
Message from Christer Almqvist <christer@almqvist.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: M Purity/B&W)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: M Purity/B&W)
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: M Purity/B&W)