Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 08:31 PM 5/13/2001 +0200, Erwin Puts wrote: >What we have here is the very classical case of negating the evidence, Erwin What we have here is a problem of reaction. You post your findings to a List of some 500 members, give or take, and three react negatively. The other 497, I suspect, honor and value your findings as worthy of respect and attention. Ignore the three. Stephen Gandy sells Konica cameras or lenses, I suspect, and has a fiscal axe to grind. The Cummer Family have a long history of seeking consensus and "hey, guys, let's all get along with each other, and no one be firm!", while Dante has, on frequent occasion, shown himself to be an insightful observer of things Leica, though I have often disagreed with his conclusions. Ignore the carpers, Erwin. The nay-sayers are ignoring the worth of your analysis and the depth of your expertise. Thank you for the posting of your analysis and conclusions! Marc msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!