Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Friday FS- NOT!!! Thread change rant....ROWRLBAZZLE!
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 19:50:30 -0500
References: <3AAAA0AA.8973512F@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <3AA973D3.24411.16D720E@localhost> <00f501c0a8fc$98c44b40$32d25818@triad.rr.com> <3AAA6EBE.AD2D4406@earthlink.net> <3AAAA0AA.8973512F@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
I believe that the 12's coverage is 120º
dan c.
At 03:59 PM 10-03-01 -0800, Henning Wulff wrote:
>
>The 12 and 15 are completely different in what they can do and how
>things feel doing them. 112 degrees and 100 degrees side to side
>respectively means that you can stand in the corner of a room and get
>_all_ the walls in. I've used a 15 for over 25 years and I've had the
>12 for nearly 5 months now, but taming the 12 is still going to take
>a while.
>
>Even wider is a 35 (actual focal length 36.1mm) on 4x5. This gives
>dark corners, but it can still be quite effective. 120 degrees side
>to side, and 105 degrees top to bottom, and all rectilinear. It
>covers 6x12 easily, with some movements.
>
Replies:
Reply from Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Friday FS- NOT!!! Thread change rant....ROWRLBAZZLE!)
Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Friday FS- NOT!!! Thread change rant....ROWRLBAZZLE!)
In reply to:
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Friday FS- NOT!!! Thread change rant....ROWRLBAZZLE!)
Message from "Tim Spragens" <info@borderless-photos.com> (Re: [Leica] Friday FS)
Message from "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] Friday FS- NOT!!! Thread change rant....ROWRLBAZZLE!)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Friday FS- NOT!!! Thread change rant....ROWRLBAZZLE!)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Friday FS- NOT!!! Thread change rant....ROWRLBAZZLE!)