Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] What makes a good photo (was: Lee's week four)
From: "julianthomas.terra.es" <julianthomas@terra.es>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 03:56:51 +0100
References: <20010127032947.BCE11834.femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[65.1.114.25]> <3A72495E.D8898E1E@earthlink.net> <010201c08820$b121fea0$511a4d18@gvmt1.bc.wave.home.com>
>>If the picture doesn't stand on it's own, all the fancy
>>wordsmithing isn't going to save it nor make it any better!
OK Ted, I'm a fan and I'm nervous tangling with you BUT two points:
1: gut feeling is easily manipulated and if people didn't think about
photography the newspapers would be full of shit lifestyle colour pictures
taken on zoom lenses that meant bugger-all...
2: you can't mean that photography is so superficial and meaningless that it
ain't worth struggling with otherwise how could us lesser mortals appreciate
the stuff that you and TIna do?
Julian
Replies:
Reply from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] What makes a good photo (was: Lee's week four))
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] What makes a good photo (was: Lee's week four))
In reply to:
Message from Henry Ambrose <digphoto@telalink.net> (Re: [Leica] What makes a good photo (was: Lee's week four))
Message from S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] What makes a good photo (was: Lee's week four))
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] What makes a good photo (was: Lee's week four))