Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
B.D.
The photo of Helen was taken with the third example of the 50/1.2 lens I've
owned, none of which have cost me more than 50 UKP, all of which have been
rather worn.
I've seen a mint in box example for 300 UKP and I'm sure you'll see plenty
in between those two extremes.
They are quite common, comparitively.
Jem
- -----Original Message-----
From: B. D. Colen [SMTP:bdcolen@earthlink.net]
Sent: 23 January 2001 22:13
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Noctilux vs Those "Other" lenses
Andrew Moore wrote:
>
> > If you missed the reference, I posted a Canon 50/1.2 (r/f lens) shot as
my
> > week 3 picture.
> > http://members.tripod.co.uk/JemK/Pik-A-Week/
>
> They'll miss it again if they use that URL :)
>
> ("Pic-A-Week" works)
>
> --Andrew
> NO ARCHIVE
If the photo of Helen - nice shot, BTW - is a typical result with the
Canon 50 1.2, I'll take one...what will I have to pay?
B. D.