Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] More PAW's question re comments asked for.
From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:49:10 -0800
References: <F17203C79991D4119B3900805F9A6BD0091093@pie-main.piengr.com>

Hello Luggers

For all of you who have been posting PAWs etc..

Many of you request comments. I'd like to suggest when posting that you've
got images for others to view, that you ALSO indicate:

If you'd like comments, whether you'd like to have an honest appraisal
(i.e., constructive criticism with suggestions for how the image could have
been improved) as well as praise
Whether you'd like those comments to come to you personally or as a LUG post
where everyone might learn from the comment
Lately I've looked at a lot of pictures posted by all of you. And though
I've seen many excellent images, I've seen a number which could have been
improved by a simple tweaking. In other words, do you want this to be a
learning activity as well as showing your stuff?

Critiquing is a great way to learn. But one has to be ready for the good,
bad and the ugly comments! This means telling someone how they could have
improved the image as well as telling them what was good about it.

ted

Ted Grant Photography Limited
www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant

Replies: Reply from Alastair Firkin <firkin@netconnect.com.au> (Re: [Leica] More PAW's question re comments asked for.)
Reply from Damian Dlugolecki <damian@teleport.com> (Re: [Leica] More PAW's question re comments asked for.)
Reply from "julianthomas.terra.es" <julianthomas@terra.es> (Re: [Leica] More PAW's question re comments asked for.)
Reply from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] More PAW's question re comments asked for.)
In reply to: Message from Tom Finnegan <TomF@piengr.com> ([Leica] (Leica) More PAW's)