Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Ted, I think that, by definition, when one announces to the world that one's picture are there to be viewed, then one better be ready to be criticised as well as praised. I welcome all comments, good, bad and in-between. Nathan Ted Grant wrote: > Hello Luggers > > For all of you who have been posting PAWs etc.. > > Many of you request comments. I'd like to suggest when posting that you've > got images for others to view, that you ALSO indicate: > > If you'd like comments, whether you'd like to have an honest appraisal > (i.e., constructive criticism with suggestions for how the image could have > been improved) as well as praise > Whether you'd like those comments to come to you personally or as a LUG post > where everyone might learn from the comment > Lately I've looked at a lot of pictures posted by all of you. And though > I've seen many excellent images, I've seen a number which could have been > improved by a simple tweaking. In other words, do you want this to be a > learning activity as well as showing your stuff? > > Critiquing is a great way to learn. But one has to be ready for the good, > bad and the ugly comments! This means telling someone how they could have > improved the image as well as telling them what was good about it. > > ted > > Ted Grant Photography Limited > www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant - -- Nathan Wajsman Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/ Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/ Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/