Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systmes
From: "Rob Studdert" <audiob@ozemail.com.au>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:11:06 +1000

On 6 Jan 2001, at 11:51, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> At pro photo here in Portland Oregon yesterday there was a guy looking at some
> older Contax slrs's on the counter. I was immediately interested becuae I've had
> my eye on an RTSIII as i keep saying. He said he'd been using them for years. I
> asked him where he takes them for when the break. He said "I don't know, none of
> mine has ever broke."

I currently have a "broke" RTS III

Cheers,

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
Fax +61-2-9554-9259
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
audiob@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html

Replies: Reply from "Dave Richards" <dprichards@qwest.net> (Re: [Leica] which do you prefer, 24 or 36 exposure rolls?)
Reply from Ken Wilcox <wilcox@tir.com> ([Leica] Re: which do you prefer, 24 or 36 exposure rolls?)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systmes)
Reply from "Rob Studdert" <audiob@ozemail.com.au> ([Leica] RE: Re: Comparison of Leica SLR and Contax SLR Systmes)