Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>>> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 23:44:11 -0500 From: "R. Saylor" <rlsaylor@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: [Leica] 50 summicron Message-ID: <200012230449.XAA22675@blount.mail.mindspring.net> References: <3.0.32.20001222084637.006e61fc@box4.tin.it> This may have been mentioned before, but for a given focus distance and aperture, a 35mm lens will likely give the appearance of greater sharpness because of its greater depth of field. For example, at a focus distance of 5m at f/8, a 50mm will have a DoF of about 6m, while the DoF of a 35mm will be (practically) infinite. Richard >>>> I seldom stop the lenses down too much, as most of my snapping is in pretty light-challenged conditions. Anyway, interesting to see how many people feel there is a difference. As for Henning's little jibe about world domination, when we're in charge (it's a Hegelian process, historical inevitability, matey, so watch your step, it's all going into the big black book) words will be spelt the way _we_ want them to be. As Humpty Dumpty said, the question is "Who is to be Master". Rob. Robert Appleby