Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 50 summicron
From: Robert Appleby <robert.appleby@tin.it>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:46:39 +0100

Just back from a few days at Brian Stevens' place in London, where I also
met up with John Brownlow to discuss our plans to achieve universal
domination. Unfortunately we've had to reschedule our assumption of power
by a couple of months, but despite this disappointment we had a nice time
wondering in the gloom of London. Brian has just recently bought a 50
summicron, as I did also a couple of months ago, and we were both noting
how disappointed we are with the results. There's a definite feel/look to
the new 35 asphs which leaves the 50/2 for dead. Brian uses the 35/2 and I
use the 35/1.4. If I have understood Erwin's comments on the 50/2, it has
excellent resolution etc but my feeling is that the newer lenses have a
much greater _perceived_ sharpness. Put slides from the 50 next to the
35/1.4 or 24/2.8 asphs and they really look soft and wishywashy. Well,
that's what I felt, anyway, does anyone have the same/conflicting feelings?
Meanwhile, Happy Christmas and so on.
Rob.
Robert Appleby

Replies: Reply from Guy Bennett <guybnt@idt.net> (Re: [Leica] 50 summicron)
Reply from "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] 50 summicron)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] 50 summicron)
Reply from "R. Saylor" <rlsaylor@ix.netcom.com> (Re: [Leica] 50 summicron)