Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Old fashioned?
From: Ted <tedgrant@home.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:21:25 -0800
References: <3A34553A.915856BE@home.com> <3A341DC2.C901ED66@camera-craftsman.com> <4.1.20001211091737.017d09d0@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>

Hey it's the "old guy here!" ;-)  You know the one, who when he speaks every
one listens.

Now would some of guys like to send my wife a note about this? ;-) She hasn't
listened to me in 50 years.   On second thought forget, but thanks anyway.

ted

Jim Brick wrote:

> At 11:08 AM 12/11/00 -0500, MEBerube wrote:
> >To the question:
> >> > >>>>How do you evaluate lenses?<<<<<<
> >>At 08:16 PM 12/10/00 -0800, Ted wrote:
> >>If what turns up on the film is cool.... then the lens is cool! ;-)
> >
> >This might possibly be the absolute best bit of wisdom that I've read on
> >LUG so far in the many months that I've been here.
> >
> >Well said Ted.
> >Carpe Luminem,
> >Michael E. Berube
>
> You have seen the light! When Ted speaks, photographers listen!
>
> Carpe Illegitimus,
>
> Jim

Replies: Reply from "Henning J. Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Old fashioned?)
In reply to: Message from Ted <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Old fashioned?)
Message from Simon Stevens <simon@camera-craftsman.com> ([Leica] Old fashioned?)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Old fashioned?)