Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Simon Stevens wrote: > >>>>>>Anyway, my question is this: What do LUGGERS think of as "old > fashioned" > in a camera?<<<<<<< > Anything pre Oskar Barnack! ;-) > >>>>Does simplicity denote old fashinedness? <<<<<< Well it might, however I'd rather feel a tad old fashioned and be using a Leica M of any kind as long as I can "KISS it" The "keep it simple stupid" method of simplicity in taking pictures while using an M camera. > >>>Styling?<<<<< Hardly. > >>>>Quality of construction?<<<<< This doesn't count as there are lots of guys shooting big old wooden cameras that are creating wonderful photography! I suppose the quality of the "wood construction" would denote a sense of quality. But not worth a consideration. > >>>>How do you evaluate lenses?<<<<<< If what turns up on the film is cool.... then the lens is cool! ;-) > If they are highly perfected aspherical fixed focal lenght lenses, is that > old fashioned because they aren't zooms?<<<<< An absolutely non issue these days as some Leica zooms are equal to primes, apo, asph. or otherwise. Simon mon ami, this set of questions is a complete non issue and you're overly concerned about something that's not worth a warm beer over. Forget the old broad and her comment, as obviously she just doesn't know what she's talking about! OR! She was making a pass at you and you didn't pick up on it! ;-) OR, it was a passing comment for conversation! ted Grant > > > Simon Stevens