Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 7/12/00 1:45 PM, Dante A Stella wrote: snip (a) > what is it really saying if a IIIg or an M3 did not need one, but yet M6s > do? That would tell me that something is wrong or was wrong with M6 quality > control in the past and that it needed to be corrected with extreme measures. snip (b) >The Leica name should be the guarantee that everything has been inspected > and calibrated. snip (c) > Certificates could undermine the Leica name. Dante- It seems that (a) is the case despite (b), necessitating "certificate" as an easy first remedy. If they are just content with it, (c) will be the outcome. On verra. Mikiro http://arbos.silva.net