Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Gandy & Puts objectivity
From: "Paul Arnold" <osprey@bmt.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:53:45 -0700

Stephen Gandy wrote:

> Well Erwin, it amazes me how maintain your objectivity  and even
handedness,
> when I see it as anything but when the subject turns to Leica.
>
In the post, Stephen, you make the point that Erwin should be working for
Leica and you cast doubt on the objectivity of his posts.

My dog isn't in this fight, but I'd like to know if you are saying that the
information which Erwin reports as facts are not accurate or, on the other
hand, are you saying that Erwin's facts are generally correct but that his
opinions based on those facts are biased toward Leica.

There is a big difference, and knowing where you stand would make an
interpretation of your post more informative.

Thanks.

- -- Paul
Paul Arnold
22 Sunrise St.
Dillon, Montana

Replies: Reply from Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> (Re: [Leica] Gandy & Puts objectivity)
Reply from Stephen Gandy <Stephen@CameraQuest.com> (Re: [Leica] Gandy & Puts objectivity)