Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] C 41 or conventional B & W film?
From: Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 09:39:17 -0500
References: <200011230130.RAA22285@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <000d01c0550b$a7ae67c0$195814cf@z4r4k8> <000701c056c8$460d5260$02c9868b@oakhill>

Black and white darkroom is very easy, and a wonderful
way to complete the circle of activities to create a photograph.

Some of the things that intimidated me with darkroom is
the need for a real dark room.

For film developing, you can use a changing bag, so no
need for a dark room.

For the enlarger, now you need a dark room.  I don't know
any way around it.

For print developing, trays are easiest - and again - need that
dark room.  But trays are so easy - and with a safelight, you
even get good at "judging" the work while it is in progress.

And for all the other annoyances, eg. dust, drying, curled prints,
well - you develop good technique and all those things get
managed.

I am trying to learn colour - and all of the above are
scaring me.

But - the one other big thing - how to find time between
work, family, stuff, to take pictures, and to make pictures.

Finally, my wife really hates the quality of prints that
our local processors provide, so - I've got nothing to
lose if I make even one better print than they can.

Good luck.

Vick





Tony Salce wrote:

> This question has little to do with Leica. I hope it is not too
> inappropriate for this list. I use a Leica IIIa and a 50mm Summar. It's a
> wonderful camera and lens. My photography is centred on family and travel. I
> would shoot only say 40- 50 rolls of film a year. I love blalk and white and
> am tossing up whether to plunge into setting up a darkroom. The cost of
> laboratory printed black and white is exorbitant here in Australia and the
> results( in my vew) are average.
>
> Given the amount of shooting I do is it worth setting up a darkroom or are
> the C41 films, TCN and XP2, the better way to go. How do these films
> iffer( apart from archival qualities)from their more conventional
> counterparts in respect of the final printed image ?
>
> Why is it that your Tri-X and HP5, appear to be favoured as against Plus X
> or FP4 ?
>
> Your replies would be greatly appreciated.
>
> King Regards,
>
> Tony Salce

Replies: Reply from Ken Wilcox <wilcox@tir.com> ([Leica] Re: C 41 or conventional B & W film?)
Reply from "Paul Arnold" <osprey@bmt.net> (Re: [Leica] C 41 or conventional B & W film?)
In reply to: Message from "Bill Lawlor" <wvl@marinternet.com> ([Leica] Re: Tri-X)
Message from "Tony Salce" <NadinaTony@bigpond.com> ([Leica] C 41 or conventional B & W film?)