Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]And.....if a thief is knowledgable about Leicas, and wants to steal one, he/she won't be fooled by the absence of a red dot. I can certainly recognize a Leica from a distance without seeing the red dot. I'm sure a thief can as well. Dan C. At 08:28 PM 19-11-00 -0500, Marc James Small wrote: >Dear God Almighty, have mercy on us sinners. > >Folks, one of the finest of urban myths, and one propagated most mightily >by the Silver Screen and the Idiot Eye, is that of the "discerning thief". >For that matter, let us wander back a half-century to radio's "The Many >Lies of Harry Lime", with Orson Welles playing to perfection the part of a >thief and con artist who knew every comodity, every value, and every dodge. > >There may well be a FEW thieves, world-wide, who know what a Leica might >be, but these are few, indeed. Most know the ones who advertise on the >Tellie -- Nikon, Canon, Sony, und so weiter -- but they have just never >heard of Rollei or Leica or Hasselblad. Hence, they won't steal these >cameras, as they suspect they will have difficulty fencing such. They will >take a Nikon P&S over a Leica IIIc K as they are just too damned >unsophisticated to know the difference. > >Now, if Professor Moriarty were still around, perhaps this would be a >matter for the geriatric Sherlock Holmes to handle from his bee-keeping >hideout in Surrey. But, otherwise, fearing the red dot is perhaps the >ultimate exercize in sheer, bloody paranoia. > >Marc > >msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 >Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir! > > >