Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>>> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 07:35:47 -0500 From: "Dan Honemann" <ddh@home.com> Subject: RE: [Leica] Gigabit continued Message-ID: <NBBBIDNIGLFOKNLJCPLHOEOPELAA.ddh@home.com> References: I wouldn't argue that "what was good enough for Cartier-Bresson should be good enough for us (technically speaking)." I _would_ say that I would be extremely happy (ecstatic) if I could get my prints to look (again, technically) as good as HCB's! To go beyond that would be incredible. But is that possible once we introduce the artistic/creative side of the equation? In other words, can one achieve the resolution--even with Leica lenses and gigabit film--you speak of here while shooting handheld candids on the street? Perhaps if the film can be pushed enough to allow for 1/1000 sec shutter speeds @f5.6, it may be. In any event, the film sounds exciting. Thanks, Dan <<<< I remember looking at some HCB prints in the print room at the V&A in London many years ago. Incredible place, you just go upstairs and order up from the stacks anything you'd care to see - Siskind, HCB, Harry Callahan, whatever. I was amazed at the time how very _bad_ the print quality was. Muddy greys, poor focus on the baseboard. Now they may well have been workprints that H threw out, or his printer, rather. But nonetheless, I was very disappointed. And his printing as such has never got me going very much. But I don't think that part of the chain was very important to him. He seems to have been more interested in the snap than the print. At that time I was a complete admirer of the Big H. And still am, to a lesser degree. Rob. Among the V&A's collection were several pictures of trees in a wood - not at all what I would have expected from HCB.