Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No, you better not. dan c. ;-) At 07:10 AM 19-10-00 -0700, Roger Beamon wrote: >Dare I mention Coca Cola? >-- >Roger > > >On 19 Oct 2000, Dan Cardish wrote, at least in part: > >> You miss my point. You and I both know that the pre-TTL is >> preferable, but I can't see Leica Corp. ever admitting that. >> >> Dan C. >> >> At 06:51 AM 19-10-00 -0400, Vick Ko wrote: >> >I checked out both TTL and non-TTL at the store when I bought my >> >M6. I bought the non-TTL because I could use my DR Summicron with >> >it. The TTL one doesn't work on the closer range. >> > >> >Vick >> > >> > >> >Dan Cardish wrote: >> > >> >> How can they bring back the M6 "classic" without looking like >> >> fools? On paper, the TTL version is much preferred, so how >> >> can they explain a decision to re-introduce a camera *without* >> >> TTL? > > > >