Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LHSA meeting
From: "Roger Beamon" <roger@beamon.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 07:10:13 -0700
References: <39EED21E.BFDDABEA@sympatico.ca>

Dare I mention Coca Cola?
- --
Roger


On 19 Oct 2000, Dan Cardish wrote, at least in part:

> You miss my point.   You and I both know that the pre-TTL is
> preferable, but I can't see Leica Corp. ever admitting that.
> 
> Dan C.
> 
> At 06:51 AM 19-10-00 -0400, Vick Ko wrote:
> >I checked out both TTL and non-TTL at the store when I bought my
> >M6. I bought the non-TTL because I could use my DR Summicron with
> >it. The TTL one doesn't work on the closer range.
> >
> >Vick
> >
> >
> >Dan Cardish wrote:
> >
> >> How can they bring back the M6 "classic" without looking like
> >> fools?   On paper, the TTL version is much preferred, so how
> >> can they explain a decision to re-introduce a camera *without*
> >> TTL?

In reply to: Message from Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] LHSA meeting)