Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] LHSA meeting
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 07:42:52 -0400
References: <3.0.6.32.20001018230706.0097f300@pop.microtec.net>
 
You miss my point.   You and I both know that the pre-TTL is preferable,
but I can't see Leica Corp. ever admitting that.

Dan C.

At 06:51 AM 19-10-00 -0400, Vick Ko wrote:
>I checked out both TTL and non-TTL at the store when I bought my M6.
>I bought the non-TTL because I could use my DR Summicron with it.
>The TTL one doesn't work on the closer range.
>
>Vick
>
>
>Dan Cardish wrote:
>
>> How can they bring back the M6 "classic" without looking like fools?   On
>> paper, the TTL version is much preferred, so how can they explain a
>> decision to re-introduce a camera *without* TTL?
>>
In reply to: Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> (Re: [Leica] LHSA meeting)