Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Folks, Given we have this discussion regarding ink jet vs wet print creating a basically "real or not real print" I'd like to add a comment that I don't think I would have earlier on the basis of a "mechanical printer". Until seeing B.D.'s ink jet prints first, then being caught up in the beauty of Tina's piezography prints, followed by the wonderful copy of Johnny Deadman's out of this world piezography print from "Human Traffic," I can only say the quality in the piezography prints is absolutely a match for many fine art prints I've handled or seen hanging in galleries. And I'd have to offer without prejudice, the piezography print of Johnny's is far superior to many fine art prints I've seen over the years!. Until you've held a 11 1/2 X 17 piezograph print, you have no idea how incredible the results can be. And if you weren't told it was ink jet printed, you would by feel of paper and look of image, believe you were holding a wet darkroom, out of this world print created by a master printer. Accept the piezograph would be better! ;-) That's all, ted