Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan Post wrote: > > Welcome! > I might slip and call you "Stan th' Man", so be patient with me- we're all > crazy here in the Monkey House! > I hope you can get a 'real' Leica- I recently sold IIIc to a Lugger for > what I paid for it- about $225, since he was a LUGger and that makes him a > sterling fellow! If I run across another bargain, I'll keep you in mind! > I admit, I play on E**y, as well, and have come across some good bargains- > Leicas are rather 'tight' right now as the Pacific Rim has come alive, and a > lot of them are drawing high prices- however, like the tides- the prices > rise and fall, so you may get lucky- hopefully in the not too distant > future! > I agree with the LUGger that suggested the IIIa- I had one for years, and it > is a really nice camera- not as solid as the later IIIc, etc, but > considering alot of them are still working over 60 years after being made- > they are sturdy enough!! :o) > The important thing here is to expose film!!! That what it boils down to! > There are a lot of fans of the Jupiter optics here, so don't feel compelled > to hide in the closet- come on in and join the fray! > Dan (One of the Craziest!) Post ><Snip> Isn't a IIIa considered a "Barnack" camera while later ones are not? I mistakenly sold mine and will have to buy it back. Markwr