Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Noctiluces - was 35mm f.2 Summicron ASPH vs 35mm f1.4 Summilux ASPH
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:20:44 -0700
References: <70.3680767.2704b5d4@aol.com>

><Snip> 
> Your question, should you choose to answer, is whether your experience is
> consistent with Erwin's.  Better yet, practical advice would be most welcome
> to those of us using or contemplating purchase of the Noctilux.
> Many thanks.
> 
> Joe Sobel

Do you have a tan?
Then you don't need a Noctilux!
Are you afraid of shooting in the dark?
Then you don't need a Noctilux!
Fond of stopping down and tripods and strobes?
Then you don't need a Noctilux!
the way i see it, the Noctilux is for creatures of the night.
not for normal photography/ers.
markwr

In reply to: Message from Krechtz@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Noctiluces - was 35mm f.2 Summicron ASPH vs 35mm f1.4 Summilux ASPH)