Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm wondering if anyone has experience with John Van Stelten of Focal Point, Inc. I have two lenses with haze issues and his estimates look pretty good. Also I read a recommendation for Sherry Kraunter to do a CLA on an M3. Does anyone have an email address or website for her? thanks dick harig - ----- Original Message ----- From: <Krechtz@aol.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 7:24 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Pensees (some answers) > Thought I would take a quick shot at this. > > Joe Sobel > > In a message dated 9/22/00 6:55:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dante@umich.edu > writes: > > << > 1. If Leicas have a theoretically unlimited life, even if digital > did not take over, would prices eventually come down on used gear anyway > - it would seem that with an unlimited number of M6s to be produced, > there would be a glut.>> > > I'm no economist, but the law of supply and demand would seem to hold that a > hypothetical unlimited supply of items having eternal life presents an > obstacle to maintenance of high prices for such items. > > << 2. If Ebay, LUG and other information-enhancing activities did not > exist, would any of us keep lenses longer? Many things you see come up > for sale on Fridays have been owned for 40 years. I think in the old > days trade-ins were a wash, so people just kept stuff.>> > > Probably. Lack of a market place tends to keep the market quiet. > > <<3. If an M3 had no framelines, would the field be equivalent to a > 40mm lens?>> > > Depends on eye relief. Eyeglass wearers sometimes complain they cannot see > even the 50mm frameline. Other users claim they can see a full 35mm field of > view, probably by pressing the camera so tightly against their faces that > they have permanent "backdoor" imprints on their cheeks. The literal answer > to the question would be that the presence or absence of framelines does not, > in and of itself, have any bearing upon the field of view actually > encompassed by a given finder, since the frameline is only an indicator of a > defined field of view which must always be smaller than the finder's field of > view in order to be visible. > > <<4. Does a chrome M body with brass covers feel different from one > with alloy covers?>> > > Probably feels secretly superior but outwardly humble. > > << 5. Just what is Vulcanite and how do they apply it so evenly at the > factory? Is it a liquid which is then embossed while on the parts?!>> > > I hear tell it's a rubber compound. My guess is they dip the camera in the > stuff, then roll it around on a table top that has that pebble-grained fake > leather surface. The backdoors are done separately, of course (thought you > had me there, didn't you?). > > <<6. Is it really easier to load an M3 than an M4? Seems to be the > case - I like the pullout spool better than the poke-your-finger thingie > on the 4 and 6.>> > > Sure, if the user really believes that it is. I am somewhat curious, > however, as to how you developed the finger-poke technique. Was that from a > book or just another manifestation of the well known"intuitive operation" > thing about Leicas? > > << 7. When you touch an LHSA or Millenium M6, can you tell by touch that > the covers are CNC milled, or is that just a nasty thing someone said > here?>> > > The actual technique is to hold the hands a few inches above the camera, > palms down, with eyes closed, then just feel the vibrations. > > <<8. Does anyone know why Leitz/Leica makes so many iterations of the > same 35/50 shade when there is no identifiable functional difference? I > seem to be accumulating these at a scary pace. > >> > > I doubt they are still making all those items. More like a succession of > models over a period of time. You've just been one of the fortunate few. > Make sure you don't dump any rare old versions at obscenely low prices! As > to functional differences, I believe the later models have cutouts, probably > for better ventilation. > > Hope I was able to help.